Claim representative Beth adjusted a property damage claim in which the insured’s loss totaled $2,500. She knew that the insured had suffered some financial hardships and was eager to receive some cash as soon as possible. Optimistic that the insured could be persuaded to take less than the full value of the claim if a draft was delivered right away, she offered $1,500 to settle the claim. The insured surprised Beth by filing a small claims suit against the insurer in which he recovered the full $2,500 value of the claim. This is not the first time this tactic has backfired on Beth. Beth may be in violation of which one of the following unfair claim practices regulations?

Insurance

Are you looking for the correct answer to the question “Claim representative Beth adjusted a property damage claim in which the insured’s loss totaled $2,500. She knew that the insured had suffered some financial hardships and was eager to receive some cash as soon as possible. Optimistic that the insured could be persuaded to take less than the full value of the claim if a draft was delivered right away, she offered $1,500 to settle the claim. The insured surprised Beth by filing a small claims suit against the insurer in which he recovered the full $2,500 value of the claim. This is not the first time this tactic has backfired on Beth. Beth may be in violation of which one of the following unfair claim practices regulations?”? If that’s the case, you don’t have to worry anymore. AzAnswer team is here with the right answer to your question. Please check below to know the answer.

Claim representative Beth adjusted a property damage claim in which the insured’s loss totaled $2,500. She knew that the insured had suffered some financial hardships and was eager to receive some cash as soon as possible. Optimistic that the insured could be persuaded to take less than the full value of the claim if a draft was delivered right away, she offered $1,500 to settle the claim. The insured surprised Beth by filing a small claims suit against the insurer in which he recovered the full $2,500 value of the claim. This is not the first time this tactic has backfired on Beth. Beth may be in violation of which one of the following unfair claim practices regulations?

Options

A. Compelling an insured to sue to recover amounts due under an insurance policy
B. Failing to respond to demands to settle under an insurance policy
C. Misrepresenting insurance policy provisions
D. Failing to reasonably investigate claims for damages under insurance policies

Answer: A. Compelling an insured to sue to recover amounts due under insurance policies by offering amounts that are substantially lower than the amounts ultimately recovered in legal actions brought by such insureds is usually a prohibited practice.

The above question Claim representative Beth adjusted a property damage claim in which the insured’s loss totaled $2,500. She knew that the insured had suffered some financial hardships and was eager to receive some cash as soon as possible. Optimistic that the insured could be persuaded to take less than the full value of the claim if a draft was delivered right away, she offered $1,500 to settle the claim. The insured surprised Beth by filing a small claims suit against the insurer in which he recovered the full $2,500 value of the claim. This is not the first time this tactic has backfired on Beth. Beth may be in violation of which one of the following unfair claim practices regulations?, Was part of Insurance MCQs & Answers. I hope you got the correct answer to your question. Have a great time ahead.